Just a quick update on the going-ons of the YCG Podcast.
This week and weekend, both myself (being Kyle who is writing this) and Justen were away, so we of course where unable to record the podcast. But fear not listeners, we will be returning to you next week on our normal schedule (though I admit we’ve been pretty shoddy in upload times before). That means next week you can look forward to a new upload with certainty, unless something no-good terrible happens of course!
With the same preface in mind, I (still being Kyle) have no article for this here Monday because I was away. I will also be getting back to my regular article schedule next week. I’ve recently been playing a lot of games using the newer Cyber Dragon support cards from the structure deck and if you so desire I could talk about some of my thoughts, since I actually very much like the deck.
QOTW? Question of the Week:
Lightsworn Sanctuary! Discuss your thoughts on this card in the comments section below! Is it good? Suck or cool?

As ive started to play sworns again, i was excited to see the effect spoiled, but i was underwhelmed i was hoping for a card that breaks them, but its just a solid card that ill play.
Ya, I was quite underwhelmed as well, not that I really expected much out of it though. I feel like the destruction prevention effect is the most important part, rather than the recursion effect.
I agree, the protection is cute. Im not sure if it will find a way into my build tho, it can be dead if uve no sworn in hand and is massive mst bait, witch doesnt matter a ton because we want them in grave anyway but still can really suck. I think id almost rather play 1-2 monster reincarnation so i can get back a JD in addition to whatever else i may want by ditching a ruler, necro, wyvren or a sworn, it seems live more often. Also on another note i built heros as a kinda second deck i think its simiular to you old build but idk ive had great success with it on ygo but at locals it just seemed to fall flat. Id like to get your opinion on my build if thats possiable